Showing posts with label Iran. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iran. Show all posts

Friday, July 3, 2009

II - Death of Louis Mountbatten, Last Viceroy of India(79) - IRA - Princess Diana(97) (Updated)

II / 11 + Shadow V / 5 (The Yacht)

The Deaths of Louis Francis Albert Victor Nicholas MOUNTBATTEN, Last Viceroy of India (1979) & Princess DIANA (1997) Updated - Originally Posted: 21 October 2008

Admiral of the Fleet Louis Francis Albert Victor Nicholas Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma, KG, GCB, OM, GCSI, GCIE, GCVO, DSO, PC (25 June 1900 – 27 August 1979) was a British admiral and an uncle of Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. Lord Mountbatten was the last Viceroy of the British Indian Empire (1947). He oversaw the partitioning of Pakistan from India and became the first Governor-General of independent India (1947–48). I don't need to introduce Princess Diana to anyone.

King George VI was King of Pakistan until his death in 1952 and Elizabeth II was Queen of Pakistan until this country became a republic on 23 March 1956.


**

NUMBER 8 / ROMAN NUMERAL VIII

As far as I am aware, only one King has been crowned with the number Eight: Henry VIII (8), infamous for having had six wives, their beheadings and the weakening of the Roman Catholic Church's power and domination by breaking with Rome, in 1533-34. Edward VIII (8) was never crowned and abdicated. He chose instead to lead a quiet life, by marrying a twice divorced American.


NUMBER 11 / ROMAN NUMERALS II (Mirror Numbers)

The number 11 and Roman Numerals II have played a role in the reign of the Monarchy/Royalty and the Catholic Church for centuries. In the 20th Century:

Queen Elizabeth II (Reign Start 06 02(Feb) 1952 - Coronation 02 06(Jun) 1953)
John Paul II (Papacy Start 16 10(Oct) 1978 - Died 02 04(Apr) 2005)


Why do undemocratic institutions/clubs still use Roman Numerals? The 11/II has played a role in the demise of some of them. Given the prevalence of 11/II in Al-Qaeda MCIs (9/11), 3/11 & 7/11), why does this number also appear in IRA attacks and Diana's innocent car accident? Mirror numbers with arcs/connections....

The following table provides examples of how II plays a role with two members of the British Royal Family.

79 / 97

Louis Francis Albert Victor Nicholas Mountbatten

Diana, Princess of Wales

Birth:

25(7) /06(6) /1900(1)

01(1) /07(7) /1961(8)

Married:

18/07/1922

29/07/1981

Children:

2 Daughters - 14/02/1924 & 19/04/1929

2 Sons - 21/06/1982 & 15/09/1984

Death:

27(9)/08(8)/1979(8)

IRA (Catholics) Claimed Responsibility for the Terrorist Attack on Shadow V

31(4)/08(8)/1997(8)

IRA Disarmed? Car Accident?...+3 Years (2000) People Connected with Diana, Harmed?!

Add 11 Days to the Day These People Died

= 07/09/1979 - 79 Years Old!

= 11/09/1997 - (9/11) - 36 Years Old.

18 Years Apart - Mid Point is 1988

19-79

19-97

Meaningless/ful?

Died 1979(8)

Died 1997(8)

As previously mentioned, 8 can equal 33, 6, SS, etc. Symbolism and Numerology is important for some groups. Call It Non-Verbal Communication and Messaging.


DARK FORCES
Queen Elizabeth II has been reported as saying “There are powers at work in this country about which we have no knowledge.” at a meeting with Princess Diana's Former Butler in December 1997, shortly after Diana's death in a car accident. We do not have a full transcript of this 3 hour meeting; we only have a filtered media version. I find this public disclosure rather amusing because it absolves the Monarchy of any responsibility and wrongdoing.


Let us assume these Dark Forces have heard certain 'private conversations' and let us assume someone knows who these Dark Forces are. Will those who know, be allowed to speak in public or will they be silenced? If the Dark Forces are serving Someone's Ongoing Interests, anyone who tries to Exposes Them, will naturally be silenced.

Various people would have observed, Diana's inquest failed to inform people about available remote electronic technology at the time of the accident, which could have interfered with a variety of electronic devices, in this vehicle and on their persons. And what else happened in 2000, to people tied to Diana, three years after her death? The problem with Diana is, she was set up, from the beginning and used through to the end. What a Fantastic Democratic, Law Abiding and Advanced Civilization Great Britain really is, NOT.

***


JOHN PAUL I - 1978

JPI was the 263rd Pope and his reign lasted only 33 days. Suspicion remains around his death because there was a series of deaths, both prior to and after his own. Refer to POPE JOHN PAUL I, Albino Luciano 1978 - 30th Anniversary Christmas Present - His Death and Terrorist Attacks.


Pope John Paul I

Only 33 Days

Dates

Date as Totals

Born

17/10/1912

8/1/4(4)

Pope Reign Begins

26/08/1978

8/8/7(5)

Pope Reign Ends / Death (Aged 65)

28/09/1978

1/9/7(8)


If you were to check simple details about popes during the last 200 years, there are a number of unique details about John Paul I. JPI was the only pope who lasted less than a year, 33 days to be exact; he was the First John Paul - he was an I, the next Pope instantly became a II. JPI was immediately succeeded by the first foreign pope, since the 1520s. JPII was the first Polish pope, with an Anti-Communist Focus and a member of Opus Dei. John Paul I was the first to controversially refuse to have the millennium-old traditional Papal Coronation and wear the Papal Tiara.

For the purpose of documenting Factual Profiles for Legal Reasons, in the summer of 1978, my sister and I went for our first (month long) visit to Poland. I was Eleven Years Old.



*

MY CONNECTIONS - THERE ARE OTHERS LIKE ME WITH IIs

I believe it is useful to register the dates of a deceased man I know because of some interesting connections, some of which follow after his death. I worked for the Duchy of Cornwall (1987 - 1989) when Charles & Diana's marriage was already in trouble (there were public and private denials but WE knew the truth. We laughed in the office because of the audacity to misrepresent reality to even Us.). I maintained some connections after I left the DoC with the Firm (The Monarchy); the deceased person to which I first refer, was killed in a road accident in Cornwall in 1981 (Buried There As Well) - he died 11 days before Diana's marriage. The sinister number 11.....

The deceased man was a non-blood relation. He had researched his family tree and found a distant blood line connection to the British Monarchy. This is not really important for me but for others...... Speak to a Doctor and he/she will explain why everyone has Blue Blood. This may all sound ridiculous, until you discover there are other connections but also other people with similar patterns in their life, which each point at something and someone. I also have Egyptian connections which I have rejected on Human Rights Violations/Abuses grounds. The British Monarchy do not care about Human Rights Violations/Abuses and this is not surprising given their extensive history of profiteering and trade with Middle Eastern Monarchies.


Refer to the End Note For More Information About This Man

Dates

Date as Totals

Birth

17/02/1942

8/2/7 (8)*

(2nd) Marriage

30/06/1979

3/6/8 (8)*

Death (Cornwall)

18/07/1981

9/7/1 (8)*


+11 Days Later Diana Married

Diana's first son was born in 1982, Diana was 36 years old in 1997.

* The Series of 888 is Extremely Unusual. Fixed?!



**

TO SHAKE IGNORANCE AND REMIND PEOPLE OF HARD FACTS
When (French) Birds Fly.......

On the 30th June 2009, Yemenia Airbus IY749 (20/2) / IY626 (14/5) crashed, following route plan of CDG (Charles De Gaulle) > MRS (Marseille, France) > SAH (Sana'a, Yemen) > JIB (Djibouti) > HAH (Moroni, Comoros). Fortunately, 8ahia 8akari has survived.

30 years ago, on this day my stepfather Roger Swire's was Married into one of Angel Moroni's Masonic Mormon Lodges/Churches. This marriage lasted only 749 days (20/2, 77², etc); he died in a road accident in Cornwall. The next time my sister, her mother, religious groups and their associates want to force evil on Innocent People for money, their name, status and connections, recognize the future consequences.

For the purpose of documenting Factual Profiles for Legal Reasons, I have presented verifiable facts, which are freely available on the internet (FamilySearch.org) and in the public domain as well as people's memories, since 1979.


***


1988
- A namesake of the above deceased person, has played a very vocal role in the (supposed) Libyan bombing of Pan Am 103 in 1988. Dr. James Swire (born 1936) lost his daughter, Flora in the 1988 Lockerbie bombing. After a Four Year absence from the UK mainland, the Provisional IRA delivered their first bomb attack on 1 August 1988 at the Inglis Barracks in Mill Hill, North London. One soldier, Lance Corporal Michael Robbins, was killed and a further nine were injured by a timer device.

**

END NOTE

Crossing Boundaries, Borders and Limits.......

FORCING PATHS AND DESTINIES.....AN EXAMPLE

There are a number of facts before and after this man's death (table above has dates), which can not be ignored. Some people will say this accident would have happened anyway. It really depends, upon what actually happens after this particular accident, in comparison with other scenarios.

This man entered a marriage in 1979 and was separated from this woman, before he died in 1981. The divorce was never finalized. Yes, a small life insurance policy was secured before his death and the man's only son, never received a penny. Without a divorce being finalized, future claims to this man's family identity and assets would obviously remain.

The relationship was unhappy, disharmonious, unstable, and void of common ground and similar education. The marriage was doomed to fail and it did. This marriage went against all religious doctrine about harmonious relationships/families. Why therefore would Masonic Mormon Missionaries and this woman, force this marriage/path? Parkinson was one of the
missionaries. Some people think they can marry the actions, successes and wealth of others. The woman had an established history of sham marriages when She had been a Catholic.

The man was educated but vulnerable and open to manipulation. His condition could be used as an emotional manipulative excuse for everything, even though it was not the REAL CAUSE in many situations. As all people know, if someone wants to sincerely help any person in need, they simply help them. They do not need to engage in a financial contract of any kind, including a marital one.

I tried to intervene in this situation, given that I was witnessing the disturbing reality. The Mormon Missionaries made it very clear to me personally, I Was Completely Irrelevant and No One was going to stop this marriage. They were all forcing this path, for some irreligious and dare I say evil reason. The fact was, I was highly relevant, I was a First Hand Witness and my communications were not for malicious intentions. It's starting to bear some resemblance to Diana's Marriage and Death, along with my factual disclosures in Geneva, in 1994. Given the conduct of certain people since 1994, it is obvious what they are driving, especially after Perverting the Course of Justice and Preventing Law Enforcement. I will make sure in the end, they fail on all fronts.

The woman wanted to get herself pregnant with this man even though the relationship was not conducive for having children. Any woman who bears children in such relationships, does not care about the child and is simply using innocent and vulnerable human life, for self serving gain.
This was the first time, a man had actually walked out, on this woman.

The woman's eldest daughter, a well known materialist, attention seeker and profiteer was involved in the introduction. This daughter's real character revealed itself later in GB and Egypt. Fortunately, I am the opposite of both of these women and I have intentionally made myself unattractive throughout life, for a reason. If you want to separate the wise and the educated from ignorant fools, who only base judgment on sexual attraction/physical appearances......

Nobody can ignore the fact there are networks across religions and also sub-groups within them, worldwide, with irreligious interests and agendas, contradicting their own religious doctrine. I have provided a simple example; if you want more proof, there are other people out there, with similar profiles. You only have to ensure factual profiles are registered and do serious research.

As I know very well, in the 20th/21st century, it is Not Negligence/Incompetence but Intent, when people refuse to register detailed factual profiles and links; my visit in 1994 to the UN and the British Consulate in Geneva is a Perfect Example of Intent. What followed was Planned and Nobody was going to Interfere, including me. Given the shortsightedness of many people involved, they will not be able to control the consequences now, which will in the end expose them and their motives.

Friday, April 18, 2008

Ministry of Defence (MOD) - Borders? Limits? Boundaries!

This post exposes another government department and how they operate. This example focuses on the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and the Iranian HMS Cornwall Fiasco, which took place 23 March through 5 April 2007.

Thanks to the Times Newspaper and their request under the Freedom of Information Act, we now know:

Fifteen British sailors and Marines were seized by Iran in internationally disputed waters and not in Iraq’s maritime territory as Parliament was told in 2007. The MoD insisted in PUBLIC that the Britons were 1.7 nautical miles on the Iraqi side of that boundary.

Ministry of Defence documents state:

  • The arrests took place in waters that are not internationally agreed as Iraqi;
  • The coalition unilaterally designated a dividing line between Iraqi and Iranian waters in the Gulf without telling Iran where it was;
  • The Iranian Revolutionary Guards’ coastal protection vessels were crossing this invisible line at a rate of three times a week;
  • It was the British who apparently raised their weapons first before the Iranian gunboats came alongside;
  • The cornered British, surrounded by heavily armed Iranians, made a hopeless last-minute radio plea for a helicopter to come back and provide air cover.
The Times Newspaper also requested information “concerning the location and position of the search party”. The request for information was from a technical device that communicated, the boarding party’s position to the mother ship, HMS Cornwall however last week the MoD responded by claiming no information would be provided as it would disclose operational tactics, routines and capability.


MoD report to the Chief of the Defence (PRIVATE) Staff under the heading: ‘Why the incident occurred’, dated April 13, 2007
Since the outset of the Iraq-Iran War there has been no formal ratified TTW [territorial waters] agreement in force between Iraq and Iran . . . In the absence of any formal agreement, the coalition tactical demarcation (the Op Line) is used as a notional TTW boundary. It is a US NAVCENT [US Naval Forces Central Command] construct based on an extension of the Algiers accord demarcation line beyond the mouth of the Shatt al-Arab [waterway] into the NAG [northern Arabian Gulf]. While it may be assumed that the Iranians must be aware of some form of operational boundary, the exact coordinates to the Op Line have not been published to Iran.


Des Browne, Defence (PUBLIC) Secretary, House of Commons, June 16, 2007
What he said
“There is no doubt that HMS Cornwall was operating in Iraqi waters and that the incident itself took place in Iraqi waters . . . In the early days the Iranians provided us with a set of coordinates, and asserted that was where the event took place, but when we told them the coordinates were in Iraqi waters they changed that set and found one in their own waters. I do not think that even they sustain the position that the incident took place anywhere other than in Iraqi waters” -


* * *

THE PUBLIC BITES BACK

As ever, the best part of these exposes are public attitudes/comments. Here are a few....


BRITISH CHARACTER. Has Mr Walker from Ladson USA no understanding of the steel like character of our British women? Other women from half the world, finding themselves in the situation of our Faye Turney, captured at gun point by the Irans and facing a possible firing squad at any moment, would have collapsed in hysteria. Not so our Faye, sitting erect, wearing a headscarf worn by many British women during Hitler's blitz while their homes were torn to pieces, their children killed, calmly smoked a cigarette! A British woman made of the calibre of Bodicia, of Grace Darling. Isolated, she alone of all the Admirals and Generals of the Iraq conflict, embarked on an exit strategy. Within fourteen days she had turned the incident around. The President of Iran ordered new suits to be made, and goody bags given as presents for the boats crews. Amazing. Could any women from any other Country single handed have prevented the situation from escalating into a third World War? In my book she deserves a medal. If only we had diplomats of yesteryear on hand with guidance from a strong Government to take advantage of the new situation and negotiate a peaceful resolve to the nuclear power station problem. Well done Faye. - Gut Liam, Hertford, Engtland


It was my position when this happened and is still my position: When the Iranians were in the process of taking British sailors and Marines captive, the British Navy and Air Force, with American help, if necessary, should have blown those Iranian gunboats to bits--along with any other Iranian forces that dared get mixed up in the situation.

Can the British public not understand that no nation that has any responsibilities on the international scene can allow its military to trodden on at will by a third-rate power? The Iranians have done this to Britain. It is an international humiliation, no matter what kind of face the politicians try and put on it. The Iranians have taken the measure of British political leadership and British resolve, and have found it wanting. The Iranians are dangerous, seeking hegemony in the Middle East, and are not now likely to be bound by anything the UK says or does. - Terry L. Walker, Ladson, SC / USA


Finally the truth is revealed. I wish people would just realize the government doesn't care about the truth. They only care that you believe the Iranians are evil just like they want you to. - Darius, Los Angeles, USA

Many thanks to President Ahmadinejad for delivering this important Wake Up Call to HMS Cornwall and the MOD but also for Iran's kind hospitality and generosity. This fiasco could have ended very differently. - Alison, Geneva, CH

What a load of nonsense. The British boat was seized by the IRGC "navy" because it was not properly supported by British or Coalition air and/or sea assets. Operating that close to Iranian waters, that boat should never have been sent anywhere at all without a proper plan for immediate air or sea coverage in case of an Iranian assault. - George Smith, San Antonio, Texas


All part of the American plan to try to create an incident to attack Iran. The Brits were being used as the bait. A few British soldiers in the interests of the US and Israel. Never mind. - Shaffiq Mahmood, Halifax, UK

This news item tells us that the capture took place in a disputed area. At the same time, let us not forget that the Iranians, when told that the coordinates they had originally provided, lay in Iraqi waters, supplied an alternative location. I wonder why. - Alice Cripps, Worthing, UK

I care. Because I'm shamed at the incompetence of the Royal Navy that allowed this group of children to be ambushed. I'm disgusted at the lies told to us in Parliament. And I'm concerned that the standing of our country was damaged by the incident. We have just seen two senior people leave BA because of the mess they made. Equally heads should roll at the Ministry of Defence. - Mike C, Chichester, England

What else has Britain lied about? - oxi, Chicago

So what's new? Anyone who has even a minor understanding of the region realises that a lot of these borders are disputed and these types of incidents are extremely likely to happen. The British Navy messed up seriously by leaving the vessel unsupported and the British government messed up by spinning an already embarassing story into a national humiliation. - Mike Pemberton, London, London

I commented last year that the Persian gulf water boundaries near the Iraqi soil remains disputed. I also stated that it was not up to the UK or USA to muscle in and to try to draw an artificial line and set the boundary. Unfortunately, it appears that such intent and by default confusion lead to the arrest of our sailors. This is total arrogance and for us to think that a questionable UN mandate to be present in the Persian Gulf gives us the right to predetermine disputed territorial boarders beggars belief. I also find our reference to the historic Persian Gulf as the Arab gulf very rude and insulting to the Iranians and we should show more respect to a nation that has referred to this waterways as the Persian gulf for the last 2500 years. Our behaviour and our wording is provocative and we should be honest enough to face this fact. Lower down the Persian gulf, is the Arabian Sea. No amount of Arab appeasement is going to change this historic fact and we should show more respect. - John, Cheltenham, UK

A gutless performance by all concerned, especially the Secretary of State and his Admirals but not the Iranians who win this one hands down..- Michael, Wichester, England

Des Browne lied to the public. On such a sensitive issue and during such a sensitive time with the Iranians, this is negligent. - Martin, London, UK

Who cares? The embarrassment is that the Iranian boat was not obliterated. - Nick, Rotherham, UK

The seizure was made by the Revolutionary Guard Corps' boats and NOT by the Iranian Navy. The IRGC is well known for its smuggling activities and firm control over criminal rackets in Iran and Southern Iraq. Since the Defence Ministry stated the reason the British boat was where it was due to smuggling activity, perhaps this has more bearing on the incident. Even if the boundary had been set between the Iranian Navy and Coalition Forces, the IRGC still acts independently. - John Bates, Melbourne, Florida

Once the greatest sea-power the world has ever seen now reduced, by their lying, incompetent leaders, to a nation of wimps. Incompetence is encouraged by lack of accountability, coverups and hidden behind phrases like it would disclose operational tactics, routines and capability. Oh pleeeeeeeeeease! - R Bingham, Lauzun, France

MP lies - Why the shock? - jj, Cambridgeshire, UK

Replace misled with lies. When will politicians learn to speak the common language? - steve tea, manchester, cheshire

The important issue is that the sailors are all healthy and were released soon after the incident. Indisputably Iran treated them with respect and showed the civility and friendliness that exists in the Iranian culture and tradition. Unlike what some want to believe, the region belongs to those who are located there. The world must begin to accept the new Middle East. That is not Bush's Middle East. Hopefully UK will be able to talk directly to the Iranian regime and stay away from the warmongers in the US government. Daryush, London, London

It seems that Britain has lost its backbone, certainly Mrs Thatcher would have had none of it! Britain is a laughing stock!! - Colin, Surrey, uk


* * *


NEWS ARTICLES

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3768243.ece
April 18, 2008 - Des Browne ‘misled MPs over seizure of British sailors in the Gulf’

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3761058.ece
April 17, 2008 - Report reveals Iran seized British sailors in disputed waters

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3761054.ece
April 17, 2008 - ‘We have cowboys . . . can we have the helicopter over ASAP?’


* * *

On a different note, What does the MoD do for Recreation .... you need to be on the right wavelength!

REMOTE VIEWING
A study was undertaken in 2001-2002 to investigate theories about capabilities to gather information remotely about what people may be seeing and to determine the potential value, if any, of such theories to Defence. The Ministry of Defence has released the findings of this study in response to a Freedom of Information request and we are pleased to now make it available to a wider audience via the MOD Freedom of Information Disclosure Log. Where indicated information has been withheld in accordance with Section 26 (Defence), Section 27 (International Relations), Section 40 (Personal Information), Section 41 (Information Provided In Confidence) and Section 43 (Commercial Interests) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. http://www.mod.uk/defenceinternet/freedomofinformation/disclosurelog/searchdisclosurelog/remoteviewing.htm